The Form

With this, the objective movement with the education of the field, ' ' to multiply without land that, in its daily participation in the Movement, has capacity of analysis of the reality, creative implementation of principles and lines politics, proposal and not only of execution of tarefas' ' (CALDART, 2004, P. 312). A release is difficult that not part of the education by itself; of the form that she is being worked currently, makes it difficult the process. But it is in the fight for land and education that the social movements of the city and the field could more be respected. Education as alternative of the reproduction peasant The right the land and the autonomy to work in this land, are basic conditions for the reproduction peasant, however, are many the forms that the capitalist system finds to remove, as much the land how much the freedom, in the familiar way, transforming them into wage dependents. The school in the field, in general, has contributed for (DES) the socialization of the young peasants inside of the familiar unit, being taught for a conjuncture is of the agricultural reality. Youthful and young prepared for the wage-earning work in the cities, they are forced not to continue in its lands.

In this direction Oliveira (1997) it displays that ' ' this young, that it only possesss as qualification the work force, is one expropriado' ' (P. 60). This says that the school in the field, until today, is plus a way that the capital if uses for expropriation of the diligent peasants. By consequncia of this process, agriculture peasant is marked in a fight of freedom and resistance against a pressure for its embezzlement. At the historical moment where we live it agriculture peasant is under pressure of the capitalist market that the force to the constant migrations, to inserting themselves in the international market, producing cultivations, to supplying workmanship hand the capitalist companies, to becoming indebted itself in the financial system, to combining themselves with agroindstrias, to be complementary the production of the large states, consuming the technological package of the multinationals (GORGN, 2004, P.

Comments are closed.